According to Dr. Marcel Just from neuroscience dept. of Carnegie Mellon University, in a matter of three to five years, neuroscience research into how we think and what we’re thinking (thought identification) will allow mobile mind reading using portable equipment. For now, here is a video on how functional magnetic resonance imaging combined with computer analysis of neural activity allows identification of thoughts:
Since none of us have our neural patterns firing exactly the same way during the same thought, the computer analysis is using fuzzy logic interpolation, just like the human mind. Well, it was programmed by human minds, so why not?According to Dr. Paul Woolpey Director of Center of Ethics, Emory University, “There is no more science fiction. All the science fiction I read in high school, we’re doing… The 5th amendment only protects us from testifying against ourselves, but what about a brain scan?..”
The only ethical problem therein is the standardisation and subsequent (computer analysed) interpretation of thought patterns. Can we apply the same standardised fuzzy logic from one person to another when it comes to more complex thought patterns?
6 Top Questions About COVID-19: What a Child Psychiatrist Has to Say On…
75-time Jeopardy champ Ken Jennings uses it to stay sharp. Yes, we must be talking…
Affirmations are one of the easiest learning tools you can use to help shift negative…
See reviews on self improvement and personal growth tools. Expert articles with easy exercises help…
New School energy psychology versus Old School QiGong proves that there are numerous ways to…
Depression as the basis for emotional corruption is examined. This paper utilizes practical sources for…